Auckland District Health Board Home | Contact Us | Phone Directory | Search     
Auckland District Health Board  
part of menu  

Trauma Homepage
Up
Navigation Bar Image
external link iconMinistry of Health
external link iconhttp://newzealand.govt.nz/

    horizontal line
 ©Copyright
 Published: 28/11/2011

Orthopaedic Injuries and Angiography

Ian Civil
Clinical Director, Trauma Service

Slide1.JPG
Slide1.JPG
47.96 KB
Slide2.JPG
Slide2.JPG
50.35 KB
Slide3.JPG
Slide3.JPG
49.08 KB
Slide4.JPG
Slide4.JPG
49.77 KB
Slide5.JPG
Slide5.JPG
43.92 KB
Slide6.JPG
Slide6.JPG
48.79 KB
Slide7.JPG
Slide7.JPG
49.46 KB
Slide8.JPG
Slide8.JPG
57.79 KB
Slide9.JPG
Slide9.JPG
54.95 KB
Slide10.JPG
Slide10.JPG
45.97 KB
Slide11.JPG
Slide11.JPG
53.28 KB
Slide12.JPG
Slide12.JPG
61.84 KB
Slide13.JPG
Slide13.JPG
46.27 KB
Slide14.JPG
Slide14.JPG
41.20 KB
Slide15.JPG
Slide15.JPG
73.02 KB
Slide16.JPG
Slide16.JPG
64.40 KB
Slide17.JPG
Slide17.JPG
62.46 KB
Slide18.JPG
Slide18.JPG
53.30 KB
Slide19.JPG
Slide19.JPG
60.41 KB
Slide20.JPG
Slide20.JPG
58.97 KB
Slide21.JPG
Slide21.JPG
46.79 KB
Slide22.JPG
Slide22.JPG
76.94 KB
Slide23.JPG
Slide23.JPG
29.57 KB
Slide24.JPG
Slide24.JPG
57.05 KB
Slide25.JPG
Slide25.JPG
46.88 KB
Slide26.JPG
Slide26.JPG
60.47 KB
Slide27.JPG
Slide27.JPG
51.48 KB
Slide28.JPG
Slide28.JPG
55.88 KB
Slide29.JPG
Slide29.JPG
72.14 KB
Slide30.JPG
Slide30.JPG
58.69 KB
Slide31.JPG
Slide31.JPG
56.80 KB
Slide32.JPG
Slide32.JPG
58.28 KB
Slide33.JPG
Slide33.JPG
53.97 KB

Orthopaedic injuries and angiography
Ian Civil
Clinical Director
Trauma Services

We don’t need to discuss this
 Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture
 Angiography has an established therapeutic role here

We do need to discuss this
 Severe (blunt) extremity injury
 Poor/absent pulses
 Variable alignment of the fracture
 Possibility of significant vascular injury but probability low

EAST has no guidelines for blunt extremity vascular trauma, but for penetrating trauma -
III Recommendations
C. Level 3
Absence of hard or soft signs of vascular injury reliably
excludes surgically significant arterial injury and does
not require arteriography
Angiography for proximity is only necessary for shotgun
wounds

Hard signs of vascular injury
 Active haemorrhage
 Distal pulse deficit
 Expanding or pulsatile haematoma
 Distal ischaemia
 Bruit
 Thrill

Soft signs of vascular injury
 Small stable haematomas
 Injury adjacent to a nerve
 Unexplained hypotension
 Haemorrhage at scene
 Proximity

How does that help?
That’s all very well but lots of patients with blunt
extremity trauma have “hard” signs. That’s why the
question has been asked.
Absent pulses?
Distal ischaemia?
are both common in blunt trauma but it is relative….
Soft signs such as those mentioned are seldom relevant
in blunt trauma.

Assessment options
 Clinical
– Cap refill
– Colour
– Pulses
– Usually done and not normal, hence the ?
 Doppler
– Nature of signals
– ABI
– Not always practical in the badly injured extremity
 Angiography (OR or Radiology Dept)
– Do you need to know the answer to decide whether to go to the OR or not?
 MRA
– Commonly used in vascular surgery but not practical for most trauma patients

Clinical examination
 Comparison with other extremity vital
 “Hands-on”
 Consensus on presence and quality of pulses
 Defer forming an opinion until limb splinted and dislocations reduced

Doppler
 Mere presence of doppler signals not reassuring
 Comparison with other side
 Wave-form assessment usually not practical
 ABIs crucial

Doppler assessment
 100 limbs with blunt or penetrating trauma over 24/12 (only 22 blunt)
 All had ABI and angio
 75 with ABI >0.9 all had normal angios
 20 with abnormalities had ABI <0.9
 2 ABI < 0.9 but normal angios
 3 ABI > 0.9 but abnormal angios
 Sensitivity 0.87; Specificity 0.97; PPV 0.91; NPV 0.96; Accuracy 0.95
Lynch K, Johansen,K 1991

Doppler assessment
 96 limbs with blunt or penetrating trauma over 6/12 (only 15 blunt)
 Hard signs to OR; Patients with soft signs had ABI
 ABI <0.9 to angio, remainder serial ABI, ultrasound, and some angios
 17 normal perfusion, low ABI: 16 abnormal angios and 7 needing surgery
 79 normal ABIs: 5 minor injuries not needing Rx
Johansen et al 1991

Angiography
 Interventional radiology essential component of trauma assessment
 Can the patient go to the department?
 Is the extremity all that needs angio?
 Good pics or none at all!!

MRA
 Commonly used for vascular evaluation
 Significant limitations in the acute evaluation of trauma patients
 Essentially not practical for this form of evaluation

My approach
 If there is arterial bleeding take the patient to the OR and sort the vascular problem out.
 Otherwise take the patient to the OR and sort out the orthopaedics first (but simply and quickly)
 If that resolves the arterial problem complete the ortho fix and consider need for definitive angio (to clear) later
 If that does not resolve the vascular problem do an on table angio
 If that confirms a vascular problem, fix it then, prior to definitive ortho fix (if one needs to be done)
 Shunts are rarely needed in blunt trauma
 Consider the overall injury complex and if fits the “mangled extermity” ? is amputation best

Is there any evidence to support this approach?
 What sort of blunt extremity injuries lead to vascular problems?
 How often is diagnostic angiography required and where should it be performed?
 What proportion of vascular injuries require intervention?

What sort of extremity injuries lead to vascular problems?
 62 (out of 12,005 blunt trauma) patients in 7 years
 16 upper extremity; 46 lower extremity - all but one had a fracture or a dislocation
 82% of lower extremity injuries location at the knee or below
Rozycki et al 2003

What sort of extremity injuries lead to vascular problems?
 26 traumatic knee dislocations over 10 years in a University Hospital in Madrid, Spain.
 2 popliteal artery occlusions (7.5%)
Rios 2003

Auckland Trauma Service experience
 9195 blunt trauma patients over 7 years
 3949 lower extremity injuries, 2503 upper
 15 lower extremity vascular injuries, 9 upper
 21 dislocated knees of which 4 resulted in vascular injury

How often is diagnostic angiography required?
 300 angios in 297 patients suspected of having acute arterial injury
 27% of patients suffered blunt trauma
 Overall 28% had major angiographic abnormalities

Rose SC, Moore EE 1988

But only 27% of Gene Moore’s patients had blunt trauma!
However, Gene Moore says:
 Specifically, a fracture, by itself is not an indication for angiography but rather should prompt a search for clinical signs of vascular injury. If an abnormal pulse, or secondary signs of vascular injury are present, then angiography should be performed. Joint dislocations, especially involving high risk joints such as the knee should serve as a separate indication for angiography.

Moore, Mattox and Feliciano

What does Grace Rozycki
(and David Feliciano) do?
 Preoperative angios were obtained for 20 patients (out of 62)
 Six of these were performed in the radiology suite, the remaining 14 were performed in the OR, all of which showed vessel occlusions

What proportion of vascular injuries require intervention?

Auckland Trauma Service experience
 15 lower extrem injuries (8 SFA/pop, 7 infrapop)
 4 dislocated knees, 2 open femur fractures, remainder tib/fib fractures or crush
 7 grafts, 2 1o amps, 4 fasciotomies only, 1 ligation, 1 embolisation
 9 upper extremity injuries (5 brachial, 3 axillary, 1 ulna)
 2 dislocated elbows, 2 fx humerus, 1 clavicle, 1 ulna, rest crush
 4 grafts, 2 direct repairs, 3 no Rx

Major vascular lesions associated with orthopaedic injuries
Karavias D, Korovessis P et al. J Orthop Trauma 1992 6:180-185
 17 patients over 4 years
 70% high energy, 88% open, 65% leg
 Bones then vascular
 3 amputations
 Doppler imaging and “where necessary” angiography

Arterial injuries associated with lower extremity fractures
Andrikopoulos V, Anoniou I and Panoussis P
Cardiovascular Surgery 1995; 3:15-18
 110 cases of vascular injury associated with lower extremity fractures over 5 years
 74% RTC, remainder penetrating injury
 No pulses in 83%, 57% nerve injuries
 27 SFA, 48 popliteal, 35 infrapopliteal
 Angiography was highly recommended in cases with a clinically suspected arterial injury at the infrapopliteal level AND a decrease in doppler signal or pressure.
 Angiography before surgery in 55% and post-op in 15%

Arterial Injury in the Lower Limb from Blunt Trauma
Faris IB, Raptis S and Fitridge R. Aust NZ J Surg 1997;67:25
 32 years of experience in Adelaide
 Only 122 arterial injuries in 119 pts
 Probable arterial injury -> angio but ? how many -ve angios
 70 pre-op angios
 Arterial injury fixed before sorting bones
 Most patients had some form of mangled extremity with only 59 limbs salvaged

Orthopaedic injuries and angiography
Think of it whenever there is a fracture or crush injury and peripheral circulation is not normal
Check pulses and doppler in comparison with other side
ALIGN LIMB AND REDUCE DISLOCATIONS
For other than “check” angiography, OR expedites management
Embolisation and/or ligation have a role in some injuries
Fasciotomy commonly required
Vascular repair before definitive bony stabilisation


Created by IrfanView